Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )


Important

The forums will be closing permanently the weekend of March 15th. Please see the notice in the announcements forum for details.

Pages: (3) [1] 2 3  ( Go to first unread post )
Highly Compressible Tv Show
« Next Oldest | Next Newest » Track this topic | Email this topic | Print this topic
jcsston
Posted: Nov 18 2002, 05:16 AM


Matroska Dev


Group: Moderators
Posts: 553
Member No.: 652
Joined: 3-November 02



I have some that I think is a bit funny.
A local TV station broadcasts Star Trek Voyager reruns Late Sunday Nights. I programmed my computer to record them.
Now whenever I compress them using DivX my average bitrate is around 480kbit no matter how high the bitrate is set even on two pass. Now at first I thought my filters was doing this but even with different filters my output size is the same 150MB, even for different episodes. In DivX I have all the Mpeg4 Enhancements enabled and the Pycovisual to Strong. When I watch the compressed video it look okay to me.
I use ATI TV to record them to MPEG-1 320x240 at 8Mbit could this cause them to compress so well?

--------------------
Use the Matroska file format
 
       Top
fccHandler
Posted: Nov 18 2002, 06:23 AM


Administrator n00b


Group: Moderators
Posts: 3961
Member No.: 280
Joined: 13-September 02



IMHO, 320 x 240 is "lo-res", but hey, whatever works for you. If you're happy with it, then we are all happy for you! biggrin.gif

BTW (someone correct me if I'm wrong) but in my experience "Psychovisual enhancements" makes not one bit of difference in the size of the output file?

--------------------
May the FOURCC be with you...
 
     Top
BaronVlad
Posted: Nov 18 2002, 09:31 AM


Terrorhörnchen


Group: Moderators
Posts: 335
Member No.: 28
Joined: 12-July 02



QUOTE (fccHandler @ Nov 18 2002, 12:23 AM)
IMHO, 320 x 240 is "lo-res", but hey, whatever works for you. If you're happy with it, then we are all happy for you! biggrin.gif

BTW (someone correct me if I'm wrong) but in my experience "Psychovisual enhancements" makes not one bit of difference in the size of the output file?

Hi fccHandler,

I think you are right, with both smile.gif

320*240 is very low and your problem should be because of MPEG1, I had many movies in MPEG1 that i wanted to compress with DivX into 700 MB. No Chance, they always were about ~400 MB in the end, no matter, what bitrate I had.

I also made the experience, that there was no difference in filesize between "Psycho"-movies and "Non-Psycho"-movies.

You should capture directly with VDub (Codecs Huffyuv or MJPEG) at a higher resolution (Full PAL/NTSC if possible) and then (resize to a smaller resolution !!! and) compress into DivX, it is better quality. Or you can try MPEG2 recording (i.g. using PowerVCR) and then let GKnot do the compression for you.

Or you are just happy, that your files are so small that you can burn them easily an a normal CD-R biggrin.gif

--------------------
Hochachtungsvoll

BaronVlad

user posted image

Deutsch >> Capture FAQ - Capture Guide
Englisch >> Capture FAQ - Capture Guide
 
    Top
jcsston
Posted: Nov 18 2002, 09:16 PM


Matroska Dev


Group: Moderators
Posts: 553
Member No.: 652
Joined: 3-November 02



Well I also tried capturing at 640x240 MPEG-2 and the end result was the same.

BTW Capturing with VirtualDub isn't an option since the show comes on at 3:00AM. VDub VCR doesn't work with my Ati Aiw.

--------------------
Use the Matroska file format
 
       Top
BaronVlad
Posted: Nov 19 2002, 08:05 AM


Terrorhörnchen


Group: Moderators
Posts: 335
Member No.: 28
Joined: 12-July 02



QUOTE (jcsston @ Nov 18 2002, 03:16 PM)
VDub VCR doesn't work with my Ati Aiw.

??? Then your ATI AIW is the only ATI AIW that doesnt work with VDub VCR, normally it works wonderful.

--------------------
Hochachtungsvoll

BaronVlad

user posted image

Deutsch >> Capture FAQ - Capture Guide
Englisch >> Capture FAQ - Capture Guide
 
    Top
jcsston
Posted: Nov 19 2002, 07:15 PM


Matroska Dev


Group: Moderators
Posts: 553
Member No.: 652
Joined: 3-November 02



Well it works with the timer but I can't get it to change channels automatically.
My processor is an T-Bird 650Mhz and it cannot play 640x240 DivX that well and that's why I'm stuck with the miserly low resolution of 320x240. But it's better that my previous setup 250mhz 15fps wink.gif

--------------------
Use the Matroska file format
 
       Top
jcsston
Posted: Nov 19 2002, 10:30 PM


Matroska Dev


Group: Moderators
Posts: 553
Member No.: 652
Joined: 3-November 02



After reading about it online I finally downloaded the fddshow filter. biggrin.gif
It can play my DivX 640x240 smooth!

--------------------
Use the Matroska file format
 
       Top
jcsston
Posted: Nov 25 2002, 01:47 AM


Matroska Dev


Group: Moderators
Posts: 553
Member No.: 652
Joined: 3-November 02



Well this Sunday I got another episode and this time I captured it at 640x240 MPEG-2 and compressed it at 640x240. Guess what the file size was at the max bitrate. 312MB laugh.gif And it looks a good bit better than before cool.gif and I can still fit about 3 on cd. (at a bitrate slightly lower than the max)



--------------------
Use the Matroska file format
 
       Top
Spire
Posted: Nov 25 2002, 01:53 AM


Unregistered









QUOTE (jcsston @ Nov 24 2002, 05:47 PM)
Well this Sunday I got another episode and this time I captured it at 640x240 MPEG-2....

If you're going to increase the resolution on one axis, you're much better off doubling the vertical resolution; e.g., 320x480. This will preserve both fields of the original video, resulting in much better motion.
 
  Top
jcsston
Posted: Nov 25 2002, 02:02 AM


Matroska Dev


Group: Moderators
Posts: 553
Member No.: 652
Joined: 3-November 02



Wow that was a fast reply.
Anyway in the ATI MPEG-2 setup should I enable or disable the deinterlacing?

--------------------
Use the Matroska file format
 
       Top
Spire
Posted: Nov 25 2002, 02:05 AM


Unregistered









If you're capturing with a vertical resolution of 480 (which I recommend), you should definitely disable deinterlacing.
 
  Top
jcsston
Posted: Nov 25 2002, 02:23 AM


Matroska Dev


Group: Moderators
Posts: 553
Member No.: 652
Joined: 3-November 02



Thanks
I'll try 320x480 with the Smart Denterlace filter in VDub.



--------------------
Use the Matroska file format
 
       Top
fccHandler
Posted: Nov 25 2002, 03:55 AM


Administrator n00b


Group: Moderators
Posts: 3961
Member No.: 280
Joined: 13-September 02



Even today, many television shows (and Voyager too, probably) are shot on film, so for best results I recommend under Video->Frame Rate, click Inverse Telecine "Reconstruct from fields - adaptive", and set Smart Deinterlace to "blend instead of interpolate" for when the IVTC fails.

Motion will be smoother, image will be sharper, and you'll get better compression with the frame rate reduced by 4/5.

Hope this helps. smile.gif

--------------------
May the FOURCC be with you...
 
     Top
outlyer
Posted: Dec 11 2002, 04:05 PM


Spanish Section Mod


Group: Moderators
Posts: 215
Member No.: 1269
Joined: 10-December 02



QUOTE (jcsston @ Nov 18 2002, 06:16 AM)
Now whenever I compress them using DivX my average bitrate is around 480kbit no matter how high the bitrate is set even on two pass. Now at first I thought my filters was doing this but even with different filters my output size is the same 150MB, even for different episodes. In DivX I have all the Mpeg4 Enhancements enabled and the Pycovisual to Strong. When I watch the compressed video it look okay to me.
I use ATI TV to record them to MPEG-1 320x240 at 8Mbit could this cause them to compress so well?

Although thread has went a bit off-topic tongue.gif I'll give you my 2 cents on the original question: Modern codecs, like DivX, usually respect you'r bitrate settings BUT if they're too agressive they'll be ignored: if a frame needs only X bits to get a "100%" quality, the codec wont give it more than X bits.

You can get an appropiate bitarte with a bitrate calculator, in this case, doing some rough numbers and using gordian knot it gives a high objective quality (based on dimensions, duration and bitrate), so it fits to what I said above tongue.gif
 
          Top
S_O
Posted: Dec 11 2002, 05:31 PM


Vdubmod Alpha Testing Team


Group: Vdubmod Alpha Testing Team
Posts: 102
Member No.: 57
Joined: 25-July 02



QUOTE
Even today, many television shows (and Voyager too, probably) are shot on film, so for best results I recommend under Video->Frame Rate, click Inverse Telecine "Reconstruct from fields - adaptive", and set Smart Deinterlace to "blend instead of interpolate" for when the IVTC fails.
All star-trek-series are shot on film, you should be able to use IVTC.
I record sometimes from TV, too, but in PAL 25fps, is there any way to reconstruct the original 24fps here? I´ve read they use speed-up, the film plays faster than normal, but anyway there is interlacing, how does the interlacing come into the film in PAL? Is it reversibly?
 
     Top
1 User(s) are reading this topic (1 Guests and 0 Anonymous Users)
0 Members:
32 replies since Nov 18 2002, 05:16 AM Track this topic | Email this topic | Print this topic
Pages: (3) [1] 2 3 
<< Back to Advanced Video Processing