|
|
| Morsa |
| Posted: Nov 14 2002, 06:53 AM |
 |
|
Moderator of the Vdub support board
  
Group: Moderators
Posts: 640
Member No.: 246
Joined: 9-September 02

|
Here are some examples:
http://mail2.www.com.ar/ebook/levinoriginal.JPG
http://mail2.www.com.ar/ebook/levinxshapen0.JPG
http://mail2.www.com.ar/ebook/levinsharpen0.JPG
http://mail2.www.com.ar/ebook/levincolorshock.JPG
This last one was made with 15 iterations
As you can notice the original has a little out-of-focus. |
 |
| Morsa |
| Posted: Nov 18 2002, 12:48 AM |
 |
|
Moderator of the Vdub support board
  
Group: Moderators
Posts: 640
Member No.: 246
Joined: 9-September 02

|
Moderators mostly and members please post your opinions. They would be much apreciated.
|
 |
| fccHandler |
| Posted: Nov 18 2002, 01:51 AM |
 |
|
Administrator n00b
  
Group: Moderators
Posts: 3961
Member No.: 280
Joined: 13-September 02

|
My opinion, FWIW:
I'm against artificial sharpening in general. The original looked fine to me without anything to compare it to; it was only after seeing the sharpened versions that the original looks blurry.
Also, the original seems to compress better
-------------------- May the FOURCC be with you... |
 |
| Morsa |
| Posted: Nov 18 2002, 02:24 AM |
 |
|
Moderator of the Vdub support board
  
Group: Moderators
Posts: 640
Member No.: 246
Joined: 9-September 02

|
@fcchandler This source is not meant to be compressed in any way. The original is in fact out of focus, it is a frame from a defective shot I made some time ago. |
 |
| fccHandler |
| Posted: Nov 18 2002, 06:08 AM |
 |
|
Administrator n00b
  
Group: Moderators
Posts: 3961
Member No.: 280
Joined: 13-September 02

|
| QUOTE (Morsa @ Nov 17 2002, 10:24 PM) | | This source is not meant to be compressed in any way. |
But it was compressed to JPEG, and the original compressed better!
The point I wanted to make is, I wasn't aware that it was out of focus until I saw the artificially sharpened versions.
If the shot is truly "defective" in your eyes, then I agree it should be corrected. (Only the viewer can judge.) To me, it didn't look so bad and I probably would've left it alone.
Question: I believe that most people (including me) use VirtualDub to capture and compress their own videos, or to transcode videos they got from the Internet. How do you use VirtualDub?
-------------------- May the FOURCC be with you... |
 |
| Morsa |
| Posted: Nov 18 2002, 05:51 PM |
 |
|
Moderator of the Vdub support board
  
Group: Moderators
Posts: 640
Member No.: 246
Joined: 9-September 02

|
I use it most of the time to filter and enhance video. Sometimes to capture too, but with non-losy codecs. That´s why I´m always talking about its filtering capabilities! Remember the drop out filter idea??
|
 |
| fccHandler |
| Posted: Nov 18 2002, 06:08 PM |
 |
|
Administrator n00b
  
Group: Moderators
Posts: 3961
Member No.: 280
Joined: 13-September 02

|
Yes, and deconvolution
What do you do with your videos after you filter and enhance? Surely you can't store them in their uncompressed format! Do you dump them back to tape or what?
-------------------- May the FOURCC be with you... |
 |
| Morsa |
| Posted: Nov 18 2002, 08:32 PM |
 |
|
Moderator of the Vdub support board
  
Group: Moderators
Posts: 640
Member No.: 246
Joined: 9-September 02

|
Most of the time it goes back to tape. I've got a friend who works at a small video post facility. So he puts my videos in DV format (with a professional VTR) and sometimes I have played with Digibeta with excellent results!! Nowadays I'm very interested about Vdub as a Video Restorer. |
 |